Sunday, August 27

I am not at liberty to post right now.

I enjoyed this posting from the "other side" so much I have created a new category.

Ladies, Gentlemen, Sweaty Pickle, Amuzing gORT I give you the all new....

POST OF THE WEEKEND

EJ "Lucky" Cantrell said...

I have been out for a while visiting some of my old colleagues here in the everafter: Chief Poelker, Mr. Brooks, Billy Hamilton, Mayor Purz..... whoops...... she is still alive, its just her politcal career and credibility that are dead. In any event, during my haiatus, I have been reading the posts so I thought I should offer some insight from above.

First, as Ghost of Norm knows, I do not read the other site. I have gone there twice. Frankly, I find the contributors there to be unimaginitive, dim and intellectually... well you know what I mean. I should have stopped at "dim". My thought, therefore, are based solely on this site and you good people.

Second, a point of clarification. McWilliams works for an independent insurance agency an not for AIG. AIG is a large, international insurer. They were implicated by Elliot Spitzer in a fraudulent commission scheme but it was not kickback related. AIG has distanced themsleves from McWilliams and his proclivity for children which is more than can be said for Mayor Con and her bunch.

Next, Bride of Blowensme and Dill Doe's calculating assless chairs to square foot ratios does not evidence make. Imagine this exchange:

Rudman: So, are these pictures of assless chairs at the community center?

Witness: Yes, they appear to be.

Rudman: So, wouldn't you say that these assless chairs are irrefutable proof that the meetings should be held at City Hall? (Note to reader, I am taking a certain poetic license here, "irrefutable" being multisylabic, is not likely a word that Ruddy would be using)

Witness: Well not exactly. Most of those chairs had asses in them during the meeting. In fact, I see many of those asses right here in the courtroom.

Rudman: Then, if your so smart, how would we know how many asses were actually there if these pictures are so meaningless?

Witness: We actually counted how many people came in the door.

Rudman: Oh... Your witness Beavis.

Speaking of Mr. Shock, he is no great lawy.......... his name is "Beavis", enough said. Truth of the matter is that Herm is probably the only lawyer in the room (save the judge) that passed the bar on the first try.

Next, there is no change of venue available in a Sunshine Law case. Litigants are entitled to one change of judge as a matter of right but jurisdiction and venue are both proper in St. Louis County. Wonder why?

The only other venue that may be proper would be Cole County. Could you even imagine Rudman and his Flying Circus on the road in Cole County.... Wow.

In closing, this case is ridiculous and the mere defense of the case by Mayor Con should be an impeachable offense. The fees in this case will be large. All for what? To decide where to hold a meeting! By the way, this is not over. The FIRST hearing was for the TRO. This SECOND hearing is for the Preliminary Injunction. The case now heads to trial. There will plenty of motions, discovery etc that must take place before the trial on the Permanent Injunction. This will last forever.

The judge refusing to dissolve the TRO while the Preliminary Injunction is under advisement is telling. Con has lost again.

One last thing, maybe the fact that this will now head to the Permanent Injunction process is a good thing. Think of this. Discovery will now be available to Herm. This means that he can depose the Mayor, Dill Doe, Blowensme, Bride of Blowensme, K-mode, etc. He can also request documents (emails, cell phone records, hard drives etc). This could yield great information and Herm is just the man to do it.

I will be back in touch.

___________________________________________________________

A special reminder for any resident planning to attend the next meeting. Which I think is tomorrow or whenever dingbat decides to grab the gavel.

Be sure to wear clothing that accentuates your buttocks, caboose, trunk, onion, rump, cheeks and/or more popularly known as your ass.

Sweaty Pickle will be keeping a list and checking it twice; she is going to find out who's Ass is naughty or who's Ass is nice.

She will probably be snapping off a few candid-action shots also. I have heard she is putting together a calendar to be sold locally with all proceeds going to the Overland Emergency Pizza Fund.

Donna Dill presents her 2007 Asses of Overland Calendar and Day Planner. Available at local news-stands near you.

6 Comments:

Blogger suzyjax said...

I hate to see the length of your posts when you are at liberty to post.
Nice take on gORTs silliness. Please understand that she is trying to be mysterious and thus, trying to add a a certain mystique to her posts.

5:24 AM  
Blogger New Girl in Town said...

I am not at liberty to read your posts right now. I can only post but I am not at liberty to read.

6:32 AM  
Blogger suzyjax said...

Edgar, I wasn't aware that it's "special" or non-regular status meant that it would not be shown on cable.
I wonder why that would be, it is no less legitimate of a meeting and the items discussed will have standing.
I understand special "budget committee" meetings not being televised because they are still just committee meetings. However, I thought all council meetings would be shown. Or, at least that they way it should be.

9:39 AM  
Blogger Nazrudin said...

Purzner states on her website that the City Of Overland is being sued but fails to admit that SHE is the primary defendant.

The following is from a court worker:

"I believe that you are referring to case number 06CC-002772, which is styled Robert Dody, et al vs. Ann Purzner, et al. The other defendant is, indeed, City of Overland."

That woman is a big threat. The city should NOT pay her fines and/or legal bills.

12:35 PM  
Blogger Nazrudin said...

Purzner states on her website that the City Of Overland is being sued but fails to admit that SHE is the primary defendant.

The following is from a court worker:

"I believe that you are referring to case number 06CC-002772, which is styled Robert Dody, et al vs. Ann Purzner, et al. The other defendant is, indeed, City of Overland."

That woman is a big threat. The city should NOT pay her fines and/or legal bills.

12:36 PM  
Blogger Nazrudin said...

mr whitefolks, how can the public find irrefutable, objective evidence supporting your reports that such crimes have increased recently in Overland?

6:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home