Suzy and The Sunshine Law
RSMO Section 610 is the pertinent section of Missiour State Statutes that covers these laws. It encompasses more than open meetings, which has been the subject of recent lawsuits, but also other governmental information and records. The point behind the law is that it is your government and you have the right and privilege to know just about everything on how your government operates.
The law sets out the specific instances when a meeting, record or vote may be closed. It also stipulates that when in doubt, these sections of the law should be “liberally construed and their exceptions strictly construed to promote this public policy” (Section 610.011)
Class, here are the most important issues you should know about Missouri’s Sunshine Law:
- When in doubt, a meeting or record of a public body should be opened to the public.
- The Sunshine Law applies to all records, regardless of what form they are kept in, and to all meetings, regardless of the manner in which they are held.
- The Sunshine Law allows a public body to close meetings and records to the public in some limited circumstances, but it almost never requires a public body to do so.
- A public body generally must give at least 24 hours' public notice before holding a meeting. If the meeting will be closed to the public, the notice must state the specific provision of the law that allows the meeting to be closed.
- Each public body must have a written Sunshine Law policy and a custodian of records whose name is available to the public upon request.
- The Sunshine Law requires a custodian of records to respond to a records request as soon as possible but no later than three business days after the custodian receives it.
- The Sunshine Law deals with whether a public body's records must be open to the public, but it generally does not state what records the body must keep or for how long. A body cannot, however, avoid a records request by destroying records after it receives a request for those records.
- The Sunshine Law requires a public body to grant access to open records it already has, but it does not require a public body to create new records in response to a request for information.
- When responding to a request for copies of its records, the Sunshine Law limits how much a public body can charge for copying and research costs.
- There are special laws and rules that govern access to law enforcement and judicial records.
Does the class have any questions?
What’s that Mikey? You say Courtney told you that there was a violation of Sunshine Law by revealing information? Well, Mikey, such foolish statements go against the nature of the Sunshine Law. Basically it is “Sun Shine” as in letting the light flow over governmental proceedings. It is about open government, not about closed meetings. In addition, nowhere in the open meetings law does it provide for any penalty that may be assessed against a member of a public body for disclosing closed meeting infomation. Thus, it is never a violation to release information, just to withhold information.
Yes, Cindy? What about the police officers? Well, that suit was public information and even on broadcast news before I brought it up before the class. Thus, it is not even a privacy violation since court records are public. In addition, employee information such as rank, salary, and dates of employment are also public information.
Okay, one last question. Tommy? What is that? You heard about a lunch meeting between the budget committee, the mayor and a trash company that was not reported as a regular meeting? Yes, Tommy, that is covered under the Sunshine Law. A public meeting is any meeting of a public governmental body where public business is discussed, decided or public policy is formulated (Section 610.010(5). Public business is defined in Section 610.010(3) as all matters that relate in any way to the performance of the public governmental body's functions or the conduct of its business.
A court case related to this matter is The Kansas City Star v. Shields, 771 S.W.2d 101 (Mo. App. W.D. 1989). That case was about how the chairman and two members of the City Council Finance Committee of Kansas City, the city manager and the city budget director held a luncheon meeting without notice in a private dining room of a Kansas City restaurant. The following day, the committee unanimously adopted a budget agreement. This meeting, where public business was discussed, constituted a public meeting and notice should have been posted (See Attorney General's Opinion No. 10-75.) and recordings of these proceedings should be made available to the public.
Today’s assignments:
1. Read the following blog and find references to cases that are similar to issues in Overland. This is a wonderful blog from a KC lawyer who deals with Sunshine issues in the state of Missouri
2. Think about public governmental information that you would like access. Tomorrow we will start to finalize our own FOIA requests. Please begin a rough draft. You will find necessary guidelines here.
Important links for follow-up and sources of information for this lesson:
The Attorney General’s Open Government Page
The Attorney General’s Sunshine Law Page
Remember our class motto: A well-educated citizen is our best citizen.
8 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Do you have a "Special Education" class for people with learning disabilities? Perhaps Tutors for people like Courtney that need "special" attention/extra help? Heck, might as well include the Mayor for the "special" help, because after 14 years experience on the City Council (Purzner brags about), she still doesn't "GET IT" !!!!
Yes, - Overland could benefit from a whistleblower's ordinance.
I wonder how long it would be before ALL the city personnel began to snitch on each other: would ALL be fired, or would ALL be protected?
Or, might a mere threat of a snitch, send people out the door?
We may not need it once the asteroid takes out the ORT.
Professor Jackson, perhaps you could comment on the applicability of Section 610.625 RSMo which states:
610.025. Any member of a public governmental body who transmits any message relating to public business by electronic means shall also concurrently transmit that message to either the member's public office computer or the custodian of records in the same format. The provisions of this section shall only apply to messages sent to two or more members of that body so that, when counting the sender, a majority of the body's members are copied. Any such message received by the custodian or at the member's office computer shall be a public record subject to the exceptions of section 610.021.
I believe that this says unequivocally that public business that is discussed in certain private e-mail MUST be copied to the city's custodian of records. Assuming that our elected officials including Con and the bunch are ignoring this law along with the others, it would appear that the Big Herm may have yet another reason to review the personal computers of certain individuals. In fact, maybe Big Herm should be instructed to do it by the Council? No way of knowing if an majority of the budget committeee was copied unless we look. There may even be City business discussed on some of those computers in which Ms. Hanneway may be inerested.
suzyjax,
excellant class, I recommend that all citizens attend!
Lucky
You are one of my star pupils, primarily because you will always broach the best discussion topics. However, you may have a slight advantage since you were in the state house when this was put into law, right?!
Unfortunately, we cannot trust that the ORTians are sharing any of their correspondence—electronic, telephonic, or otherwise—with the city’s official record keeping body. This would be totally against their secretive nature. After all, it was this teacher who they attempted to scold for revealing information and not conforming to their secretive mandates. They can’t even provide you with copies of this mandate on secrets because it is deemed classified. Or, basically: none of our business.
And please dispense with the Professor honorific. This is hardly college material. More on the middle school understanding level, if you ask me. I am sure this concept of open government was covered in my eighth grade social studies class at Hoech.
Never fear if evicted, Mr. Whitefolks. The school will provide homeless students with free breakfast and lunch. And the nurse will dispense Sudafed just for asking.
Post a Comment
<< Home