Media Bias and Media Consultants
The latest ORTian accusations revolve around the media coverage Overland is receiving.
Ann Purzner's mailing to most of Overland (I hope to scan and post it by tomorrow) accused Bob Herman and company of hiring media consultants with the sole purpose of making Ann look bad. Why would they need to hire media consultants?! The ORT does a good job on its own of making Ann look bad.
Added to this is that the chat recently said the Post was biased because they reported that the state legislature is considering legislation that was driven by Queen Ann's faux nursing credentials. I re-read the article and it appears that Norm Parrish reported the facts in a straight-forward manner. Where is the bias? Wait—they have problems with facts, don’t they?
Ann Purzner's mailing to most of Overland (I hope to scan and post it by tomorrow) accused Bob Herman and company of hiring media consultants with the sole purpose of making Ann look bad. Why would they need to hire media consultants?! The ORT does a good job on its own of making Ann look bad.
Added to this is that the chat recently said the Post was biased because they reported that the state legislature is considering legislation that was driven by Queen Ann's faux nursing credentials. I re-read the article and it appears that Norm Parrish reported the facts in a straight-forward manner. Where is the bias? Wait—they have problems with facts, don’t they?
posted by suzyjax at 2:07 PM
10 Comments:
These ORT idiots probably do think The Post Dispatch, The State Board of Nursing, and the State Legislature are all sore losers or are co-conspirators of some sort. After all, anybody who doesn’t play along with Purzner the lying RN’s lies and shenanigans are called a sore loser or a hate group by the ORT Clansmen.
I believe Susyjax rightly pointed out the paranoia of the ORT posters in always thinking someone is watching them mowing their grass, getting their hair "styled" or stealing their identity. I am always torn. Do ORTians like Carol believe themselves so darn important that they draw attention organically? Of course they do.
Now Carol Sparks has posted another collection of bullshit under CIO and the target of her attention is none other than..........you guessed it Bob Dody, St. Louis Power Broker.
Carol Sparks is whining about losing her place at the Civil Defense Feeding Trough. Talk about a broken record.
I certainly don't spend much time paying attention to the movers and shakers in this town. Thus my surprise to learn from Carol Sparks that Bob Dody apparently controls some of the most significant public and private institutions in Missouri.
Somehow Bob Dody has influenced the Post-Dispatch, Missouri General Assembly and the Nursing Board into believing that Ann is not a nurse. Citizen Kane eat your heart-out.
It is so cool to watch Carol Sparks rekindle the "debate" over the veracity of Purzner and Owensby's stated professional credentials.
I can't think of any of the lies assorted here on the ORT Liars Buffet that is more salient and easily refuted as the false credentials lie.
Gee whiz, didn't both of these characters earn a smiley face at some conference on professional ethics.
Imagine being the person who was charged with leading the conference. You would be taking the dais excited to give your opening remarks. As you welcome the group to this years conference on professional ethics the first thing you see are two municipal representatives who have been using false credentials to win elected office for several years.
So much so as to require "an act of Congress"!
You know there was a long pause as the conference leader tried to get a handle on his thoughts. It would be like hosting a conference on Christian Ethics and suddenly noticing Lucifer and Judas sitting front row center.
Yikes. This is going to be a handful.
Slander!
Mam the state of your name has fallen to such depths that I don't know how someone could argue that you have been harmed.
You drew first-blood. You had SpyDog remove the post where you went after SuzyJacks and her family in the most ugly of ways. We saw it and we can get it from the Google archives if we want to. I love that about Google.
Slander, what a hoot Carol Note.
As if Bob Dody ever wielded that much influence.
Carol in order to sue me you would have to contact me which you have not accomplished as FINEWINE, MUSICNOTE, BLUEEYES 1+2, CIO and the list keeps growing.
I am saying that Carol Sparks posts under the above usernames on the Overland Chat. If this is false or somehow slanderous, I guess I will see you in court. I hear Doug Rudman will be available if you haven't picked out your lawyer.
I am a bit surprised you wanting to go to court considering the ORT has never won a lawsuit in regard to their kookie interpretation of the law.
Go to AnnPurzner.whatever to read what she has to say, or you can believe every other rational and informed person in the world.
What do they call a person that refuses to change their opinion even when they are the only person to hold the opinion?
Crazy or dishonest?
Slander?! Bring it on! I would love to bring out all of their lies into a court of law.
Of course, their version of slander is "the used my name and hurt my feelings" as opposed to the true definition of "Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation"
Oh wait?! That's right--slander is the spoken word. Perhaps Carol intends to sue me for libel.
Libel: "A false publication, as in writing, print, signs, or pictures, that damages a person's reputation."
Keyword: false
Carol, I did check with a lawyer, one that looks quite like me as a matter of fact. Thanks for the suggestion.
I hope you get back on the government civil defense feed bag. Ann has compensated you well for spreading heaps of bullshit on us during the past year.
Thanks for the memories.
Post a Comment
<< Home