No Substance Schneider
The Post-Dispatch had an interesting article this morning on the “Schneider off the ballot” suit. In that, the reporter actually gets in touch with Schneider to have him answer the charges brought forth in the suit.
Here is his answer:
Here is his answer:
"I was hoping we would have had a very professional race for mayor of Overland but it doesn't seem like my wishes are going to come true at this point in time," he said.
That's right. If you have no justification for your behavior, then by all means, question the professionalism of the one who points out your wrong doings.
There is no explanation/excuse for the charges brought forth. Schneider does not address the accusations at all. As the old gal used to say “Where’s the Beef?”
Of course, who needs substance when you can be so malleable?
Of course, who needs substance when you can be so malleable?
posted by suzyjax at 3:09 PM
6 Comments:
Opps, I messed up the link, twice, and had to repost (sorry 'bout that):
Well he addressed the issue directly with me in this article. We won't really know if his claim is accurate until the court hearing but it was addressed.
Also, I have seen the claim in several places as well as on this site that Councilperson Schneider signed a declaration that he did not reside in Missouri until February 2006. Have you actually seen this declaration?
I can't assume that either sides claims are accurate until I see the evidence and documentation.
True, I have yet to see the document personally. But, it is what the collector of revenue is telling folks. I guess they could be lying or mistaken.
However, your article nor your comment addresses the lack of substance and the "professionalism questioning" being done by Schneider. (the point of my post)
Well, I have heard people tell me that is what the collector is saying and that is what the declaration says but I can't really give that heresay anymore weight then I give to Mr. Schneider's claim until I see or hear the evidence myself.
That's all I've been saying.
On another Note: NGit, remember awhile back when I mentioned I contacted Mr. Knode about the Audit Petition group and you were sure I wouldn't hear from him? Well you were right, I still have not heard from him.
I tried sending another email today, but I assume I shouldn't hold my breath or anything of the sort.
Wasn't one of Knode's lines is that he is here "for the people"? I guess that says he is only hear for the people he agreees. Or, that their audit petition has something to hide. You would think if we have learned anything in the past 14 months is that openness is what the people want.
Mr. Knode has had issues with me personally for some time. So I imagine that could possibly be the reason he is not responding to me.
Maybe if someone else emails him here he will respond to them and we can learn more about this petition.
BTW anyone here see it? I find it curious that everyone who has told be they have seen it tell me they did not read it or sign it when I ask what it said.
Post a Comment
<< Home