And Its One, Two, Three Strikes Your Out at the Old Court House: Smack Down Fool!
Judge won't block Overland recall election
By Norm Parish
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Wednesday, Feb. 07 2007
A St. Louis County judge today rejected Overland Mayor Ann Purzner's request to stop an effort to recall her from office. Purzner had wanted an order to keep the recall question off the April 3 ballot because she didn't believe that there was a legal basis for the recall and that proper procedures were used to place the issue before voters. For example, Purzner contended that she vetoed a city council resolution on the issue last month.
But Circuit Judge Steven H. Goldman disagreed in his order, adding that a council action in December allowed the recall question to be brought before voters. Doug Rudman, Purzner's lawyer, said the mayor has yet to decide whether she will appeal the case. In Purzner's suit, she named as defendants, the St. Louis County Election Board and election directors Joseph A. Goeke III and Judy Taylor.
At the same time, Rudman said Purzner is not a afraid of a recall question. “She anticipates that the people of Overland will retain her,” Rudman said. Steve Garrett, a lawyer for the St. Louis County Election Board, said he expects ballots for the recall question to be printed by early next week. The group Citizens of Overland for Good Government collected 3,843 signatures
for the recall vote. In December, the Election Board certified 3,650 signatures as being from registered voters; 2,500 were needed.
The group wants Purzner removed because of her failed attempt to replace Police Chief Jim Herron and for holding meetings in a room too small to accommodate crowds seeking to attend. In the past, other judges have agreed with residents, saying Purzner improperly attempted to remove Herron without council approval and citing the mayor for violating the state's open meetings law.
By Norm Parish
ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH
Wednesday, Feb. 07 2007
A St. Louis County judge today rejected Overland Mayor Ann Purzner's request to stop an effort to recall her from office. Purzner had wanted an order to keep the recall question off the April 3 ballot because she didn't believe that there was a legal basis for the recall and that proper procedures were used to place the issue before voters. For example, Purzner contended that she vetoed a city council resolution on the issue last month.
But Circuit Judge Steven H. Goldman disagreed in his order, adding that a council action in December allowed the recall question to be brought before voters. Doug Rudman, Purzner's lawyer, said the mayor has yet to decide whether she will appeal the case. In Purzner's suit, she named as defendants, the St. Louis County Election Board and election directors Joseph A. Goeke III and Judy Taylor.
At the same time, Rudman said Purzner is not a afraid of a recall question. “She anticipates that the people of Overland will retain her,” Rudman said. Steve Garrett, a lawyer for the St. Louis County Election Board, said he expects ballots for the recall question to be printed by early next week. The group Citizens of Overland for Good Government collected 3,843 signatures
for the recall vote. In December, the Election Board certified 3,650 signatures as being from registered voters; 2,500 were needed.
The group wants Purzner removed because of her failed attempt to replace Police Chief Jim Herron and for holding meetings in a room too small to accommodate crowds seeking to attend. In the past, other judges have agreed with residents, saying Purzner improperly attempted to remove Herron without council approval and citing the mayor for violating the state's open meetings law.
21 Comments:
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
I forgot to add, nice call EJ. Your forecast on the success of the Mayor's request for injunction was Dead-spot-balls-on.
Aces mate!
Wow,
Great news and 3 Dog Night lyrics too!!! Life is Good!
A tribute to the leaders who taught us well and have inspired us to lead this community.
Inch by inch,step by step, slowing she turns BAM!!!
ORT Pub.,
Can you to anything with (remember) Rock-m Sock-m Robots?
RIGHT ON !!!!! Ding Dong the witch is gone...the wicked witch...the wicked witch...ding dong the wicked witch is gone....
Party time......
Y A H T Z E E!
EJ, I will never call you soft again.
Whitefolks, loved the video. One question. I was considering buying a rig like yours but was wondering how you keep the water in the rose vases in the back?
A copy of the legal decision against Mayor Purzner can be found here on The Overland Examiner.
opps, wrong link. It is actually here.
Our mayor seems to have hit another new time low.
Channel 11 rec'd an e-mail, I was told by Owensby regarding the teenagers that fell threw the ice the other night at Wild Acres. Blaming the 4 councilmen & Herman because they will not pass the budget. They mayor either had or has (can't remember exact wording) been campaigning for a park guard 24/7 for the park.
I do not remember this ever been mentioned before when the budget has come up, does anyone else?
Can't wait to see what is said Monday night.
The Overland Recovery Team proudly presents this video in reference to the Wild Acres incident.
The only park that Mr. Owensby would want guarded 24/7 would be Brooks Park which is in (surprise! surprise!) WARD 3!!!!
Oh what a brilliant idea blame it on the budget process---NOT. How disgusting they are. The ORT are so desperate, so pathetic, and she's just twisting and squirming and grabbing at anything.
Give it up lady resign save yourself and your family the embarrassment of being thrown out on your ass.
ORT Pub.,
Thanks for the video I can't quit laughing.
She won't be thrown out on her ass she'll ride out on her broom.
When a judge says you violated a law and assesses a fine, it means that you have done something wrong. It is like getting a speeding ticket, you violated the speed limit and you pay a fine.
I also didn’t know that angels used words like “damn”.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Con: Doug, I'm scared. Its dark in here and damp.
Dougie Rudz: I am picking up a hint of the smell of groceries.
Con: Where do you think we are?
Dougie Rudz: I'm not sure. I think I better call my brother back at the law office........(sound of dialing)........ Uh, its dark, damp, musty and smells a litte like old groceries......where are we?
Brother Rudz: Doug, I believe you have trapped yourself in the wet paper bag again.
Purzner said "I don't care a damn"
What the hell is that supposed to mean? I don't care a damn???? WTF??
She also said that if the recall remains on the ballot, she is confident the voters will keep her in office. Oh-kayeeee, then why are you fighting the recall to be put on the ballot???? What a dumb hillbilly, Purzner the lying RN is. Actually, Purzner is an insult to hillbillies.
Kenny can't quit.
He would be forced into full-time employment and would no longer qualify for the earned income tax credit come tax time.
As I have said in the past, there are only three ways in which Mayor Con and Coach Blowensme will leave city hall: in cuffs, in straight jacket and/or coroners stretcher.
They are simply too stupid to do otherwise.
There will be no appeal of recent recall decision. The law is straight forward and the stipulated facts are in agreement.
Eventually, "I'm the Mayor" is not an acceptable motivation or defense for municipal misfeasence or malfeasance.
Note to JOHN DOE: Blogger has changed its login proceedures. In order to post, a blogger must migrate to new blogger/google package. Only the original creator of blog may migrate the blog to new format which would be you, John Doe.
Until such time, neither I or SuzyJax may create a new post or add original content.
If you're considering whether or not to attend the Council meeting this evening take a look at the agenda here.
The most interesting item to me is:
"BILL NO. 07-2007 Amend Ordinance #2006-34, Capital Improvements Fund"
I wonder what that is about. I'm hoping it's about the emergency generators or something similar, but we will have to wait and see.
Post a Comment
<< Home