Tuesday, February 13

Why Does Dick Kmode Hate America, pt. 2: Seventh Day Adventists and Nazi Germany

Dicky Kmode gets embarrassed when ordinary citizen's question why he has so much difficulty attending meetings. I mean the guy shows-up now-and-then but his attendance record is abysmal. He never has his Budget Committee work done and doesn't really care about helping people.

For example, I received a copy of letter from the Overland Refuse Trust in which Dicky Kmode refuses to help individual Overland residents with their trash service burden. Dicky Kmode won't support a wealthy individual who wants to help those in need; strange, but true. He stated that he only supports charities with a 503(c) designation because of something to do with him deducting benefits from tax returns or something. Of course an individual does not need an IRS designation to give away his money; but in Dicky Kmode's World a designation is necessary. Anyway, it comes as little surprise that Dicky Kmode would hide from his responsibility to help Overland's residents by cloaking himself in the language of the secular bureaucracy. Pretending to help while working to hurt is a long standing practice among Seventh Day Adventists.

Nazi Germany was a horrible place for small denominational churches. There was no religious liberty. One small denomination that survived was the Seventh-day Adventist denomination. When Adolf Hitler rose to power in Germany, the German Seventh-day Adventist denomination (hereafter referred to as Adventists) believed it was time for a strong leader in Germany. Hitler seemed to be the best candidate because of “his personal dedication and his abstinence from tea, coffee, alcohol and meat, practices shared by the Adventists, [therefore] he was welcomed as a savior.”

n the Adventist town of Friedensau, Germany 99.9% voted for the Nazi parliamentary state. Even though the Adventists wanted a strong Fuhrer and supported Hitler, that support varied. The reason was because of Hitler’s contradictions about religious liberty. The departmental secretary of the South German Union Conference, M. Busch, was in support of Hitler and “approvingly quoted Hitler’s statement in Mein Kampf that ‘for the political Fuhrer all religious teachings and arrangements are untouchable.’” The Adventists believed that Hitler was for religious freedom, while the Nazi Party was against it. “Still, point 24 of the Nazi party program stated that the Party supported positive Christianity, without tying itself to any particular confession.” This was a debatable problem among Christian groups because no one knew what “positive” Christianity was. This problem was never clarified and the contradiction remained. When Hitler became dictator of Germany the discussion on the contradiction ended and very soon Christian groups would know what Hitler meant by “positive” Christianity.

On November 26, 1933, the Nazi state banned the small denominational churches. Among those prohibited were the Seventh-day Adventists. The Seventh-day Adventists decided to seek legal advice on what to do about the ban and within two weeks, the ban was lifted on the Adventist denomination.After this, it was decided within the denomination that “positive” Christianity meant support for the Nazi state. To show their support for the Nazi state, the Adventists sent a letter to the “Nazi Ministry of Interior an official memorandum on Adventist teachings, church organizations, social activities and attitude to the government.”The Adventists also informed the Interior that there church “members hold ‘German attitudes.’”Pointing out that the government’s suspicion and concern should be to a “rival schismatic group, the Seventh-day Adventist Reform Movement, whose attitudes, the Adventists insisted, were far from ‘German.’” It seems that the Adventists were more concerned with holding German attitudes then holding Adventists attitudes.

It was because of this letter that the Nazi government noticed the Reform Adventist denomination. In trying to distance themselves from the Reformers, the Adventists led the Nazi government to them. The government investigated the Reformers and decided that they held different views from the acceptable Seventh-day Adventist denomination.The Reformers were then banned on April 29, 1936.The Seventh-day Adventists believe in religious liberty, but instead of voicing their outrage over the persecution of the Reformers and the Jews, the Adventist leaders decided to take action against these two groups. The Adventist leaders “issued directives to prevent the Reformers from joining the Adventist Church.”And they expelled Adventists who had a Jewish background from the Church.The Adventists were unwilling to even protect their own members if they thought the Nazi government would disapprove. The state was able to control the Church because there was no religious liberty. This is not to say that individual Adventists did not help Jews or other undesirables. The Adventists were notable,

In 1935, the privileges enjoyed by Adventists, such as keeping the Sabbath, selling religious literature, money transfers that were necessary for missionary work, and certain publications were forbidden.This made the German Adventists reconsider their position on religious liberty of keeping church and state separated. They knew Nazi Germany was receiving a bad public image abroad because of its treatment of small denominational churches whose home base was in the United States. If the smaller denominations were willing to help improve the Nazi image abroad, the Nazi government was willing to allow those denominations some leniency. This was the starting point of the German Seventh-day Adventist denomination sacrificing integrity and basic denominational principles. The denomination “worked with German authorities to cultivate a better image for Nazi Germany in America in order to get better treatment at home.”This was accomplished through the Adventist welfare program.

The Seventh-day Adventist welfare system was considered the best in Germany. Their organization in welfare made the Adventists stand out. Through their welfare system, the Adventist Church was able to show their “Christian principles and [their] patriotic loyalty to the state.” The Nazi government was satisfied with the work the Adventists were doing but not with the language. Instead of using “Christian” it was renamed “heroic.”The Adventists welfare program was incorporated into the state’s National Socialist People’s Welfare Department. The incorporation went against their belief that church and state are to remain separate. The German Adventists welcomed the incorporation of their welfare program. They believed they could accomplish greater things and help more people. But with the incorporation, the Adventists had to obey the state’s laws, which were, no Jews, anti-socials or undesirables were to be given welfare.The Adventists - on their own - added that no Seventh-day Adventist Reform Movement members were to receive help. The Adventists were not helping more people, in fact they were discriminating against the people who needed their help the most. Along with the welfare programs of the Adventist, the health reforms and racial hygiene became important.

The Adventists believed that along with their welfare program, their health ideals were leading the way for a new Germany. Adolf Minck, soon to be president of the German Adventist Church, said, “We are not unprepared for the new order. After all, we have helped prepare the way for it, and helped to bring it about. The problem with supporting the Nazi government in their health program was the government’s belief in the principles of Darwinism. The Adventists denominational stance was against Darwin’s principles. The German Adventists sacrificed this principle for the Nazi government. In order to gain favor with the Nazi government, the Adventists changed what was written in their publications and reformed their health message. The Adventists “frequently print[ed] negative comments about the Jews.” They also tried to show that even though the Adventists teachings about the Sabbath seemed Jewish, they were not Jewish.The Adventists also believed in the sterilization program. Direct statements and the reprinting of Adventist articles showed their support for sterilization.

The mentally weak, schizophrenics, epileptics, blind, deaf, crippled, alcoholics, drug addicts – all were to be sterilized. ‘This law,’ an article in the Seventh-day Adventist paper Jugend-Leitstern said, was ‘a great advance in the uplifting of our people.

The position of the German Adventists changed from “caritas, the caring for the less fortunate and weak, to elimination of the weak, as the work of God. Their strong right arm had led German Adventists to a volkisch position.”The Adventists had built a “well organized, efficient welfare system that seemed particularly well suited to work with state authorities.”This system allowed Hulda Jost to be recognized by the Nazi regime."

Well we will stop right there and pick-up this topic again, hopefully being able to trace the history of Dicky Kmode's Adventist/Nazi Church all the way to Dicky Kmode's door. All of that information and we haven't even covered libel and slander.

I swear to God, Mike.........








9 Comments:

Blogger Edgar Casey said...

Water rescue sparks budget debate

Mayor says park ranger would have meant earlier rescue for two teens

3:40 PM  
Blogger c3missile said...

Well said Gravy.
He has missed 25% of the meetings in the last year, plus walking out of several others early in the year.

4:26 PM  
Blogger John Moyle said...

The St. Louis County Election Board posted their "complete list of candidates and issues" for the April 3rd 2007 election on their web site. You can see it here.

Overland's elections appear on pages 74 and 75 and it includes the Recall of Mayor Ann Purzner(Prop. A). Also, Ritenour School Districts Prop. R appears on page 117.

12:13 AM  
Blogger onelayer said...

It was so nice to see it on the screen, hopefully one step closer.

4:35 AM  
Blogger John Moyle said...

My pleasure. :-)

Funny story: I had a few issues in mind back when I covered the Jan 22nd meeting. As a result, I filed away my video of the meeting as there was little I wanted to add from it. I mean, the fighting over how many votes this and that takes may be fun to watch, but it doesn't do much for Overland's image.

Turns out I missed a few gems as a result. Thanks to the Mayor's claims at the February 12th meeting I went through my video with a fine toothed come and came up with some real winners. You can see them all (and more) here.

My personal favorite is this one , though this other one is a close second.

Enjoy.

11:37 AM  
Blogger John Moyle said...

Just to avoid confusion, that second favorite video I linked to is not from the January 22nd, 2007 Council meeting. It is from earlier last year.

1:24 PM  
Blogger ORT Public Relations said...

Councilman Knode is a serious candidate.

As Budget Chairman, he declares there will be no clowning around with the city's budget!

5:27 PM  
Blogger onelayer said...

Fine Wine,

Question.

While Owensby was out shoveling snow did you notice if he was wearing his battery powered heated wig or was there an extention cord coming out of his ass?

4:27 AM  
Blogger onelayer said...

With Ms. Purzner' reign in office hopefully coming to an end in April. I was thinking we should get her a parting gift.

Have any ideas on what it should be?

I was thinking along the lines of a scrapbook "This was your life as mayor of Overland Ann Purzner." I think she would enjoy reflecting on all of her accomplishments as mayor.

5:34 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home