reprinted from the 03/20/2007 issue of the Overland -St Ann Journal
http://overland-stannjournal.stltoday.com/articles/2007/03/20/opinions/sj2tn20070320-0321flo_editorial_1_1.ii1.txtTuesday, March 20, 2007 6:32 PM CDT
"You don't think I'm a witch, do you?"
Overland Mayor Ann Purzner posed the question in jest last week during a meeting with the
North County Journal's editorial board to explain why she shouldn't be recalled from office on April 3. Although tongue-in-cheek, the remark reveals Purzner's perspective on the recall - that she's been miscast as the villain in the long-running soap opera of Overland politics. She insists she has the city's best interest at heart, and that her opponents are misguided, uninformed or spiteful. Clearly, she feels persecuted.
But Proposition A, the ballot measure that asks whether she should be removed from office, isn't personal. The question before voters on April 3 is not whether she's a good person - even some of her detractors will acknowledge that much - it is whether she has been, and can be, an effective leader for Overland.
The answer to that question has become clear during the tumultuous 11 months Purzner has occupied the mayor's office: She's not the person for the job.
Purzner proved herself to be a divisive, destructive presence from the moment she took office - literally. She began her administration by taking legal action to be sworn into office earlier than she was scheduled to in order to block action on a redevelopment project she didn't agree with. Her objection to the proposed project? That it wouldn't include retail, even though an earlier poll of several developers had shown no interest in retail development at the site.
In the months since then, she has tried to oust appointed officials without a vote of the city council, something that, in the case of Police Chief Jim Herron, a St. Louis County judge ruled was beyond the scope of her authority to do. Her refusal to hold council meetings in a setting large enough to accommodate all the residents who wanted to attend was found to be a violation of Missouri's Sunshine Law.
Purzner has walked out of meetings when things weren't going her way, and she has attempted to stifle public comments when the tide of public opinion was rising against her.
Since Purzner has taken office, the council has become bitterly divided between her supporters and her opponents. While one could argue that the ensuing lack of action on key issues is the result of her opponents' roadblocks, it is ultimately Purzner's responsibility to ensure that the city council functions. But she has done little, if anything, to try to mend rifts or find common ground. She has no control over council meetings that inevitably disintegrate into chaos, and at times she seems to lack an understanding of basic council procedures.
Purzner's lack of leadership abilities also is evident in the city's continuing stagnation. When asked by the Journal's editorial board what she had accomplished during her tenure, Purzner was able to cite just two examples: putting city employees into positions they're qualified for, and plans for a business complex that will include Beech-Nut's home office. One wonders what she could have achieved had she tried to unite city leaders under the common goal of doing what's best for Overland.
Had Purzner been willing to admit she'd made mistakes, a case could be made that she deserves another chance. But her refusal to accept any responsibility for Overland's volatile political situation is troubling. She blames the court ruling against her in the Herron case on the judge's supposed close friendship with Overland's city attorney. She characterizes the atmosphere at council meetings as being akin to "The Jerry Springer Show," yet she seems to believe she's powerless to stop it.
Ann Purzner may genuinely care about Overland's residents, but she lacks the basic skills and knowledge to translate her concern into constructive action. If anything, Purzner's legacy likely will be that of vitriolic discourse, factionalism and mistrust.
On April 3, Overland residents should vote yes on Proposition A.
Editorials represent the majority view of the editorial board of the
North County Journalhttp://overland-stannjournal.stltoday.com/articles/2007/03/20/opinions/sj2tn20070320-0321flo_editorial_1_1.ii1.txt